82% of Americans agree an Amendment needs to be added to the US Constitution limiting how long a person can spend as a member of the US Congress.
15 Comments
When we talk about adding an Amendment to the US Constitution placing Term limits on US Congress, the most common argument you hear is, "Congress will never pass an Amendment limiting themselves." And, they're right. The second most common response is "We need to get this put on a ballot so we can vote on it."
There are four major players on the national board working to add an Amendment to the US Constitution placing Term Limits on the US Congress. They are our PAC, Term Limits for US Congress, U.S. Term Limits, Convention of States Project, and a caucus within the US Congress itself. Each of the four has their strengths and weaknesses.
Two years ago I called a meeting in Harrisonburg, Virginia, inviting members of each to join us to discuss our strengths and weaknesses and how working together will increase the probability of success and reduce the timeline in achieving this monumental goal. All who attended agreed on the need. Unfortunately, Covid put a kink in the plans, delaying the timeline. The good news is things are picking back up. As a simple overview, these are the strengths and weaknesses of each of the 4. Convention of States Project: COS was established by Citizens for Self-Governance, which has very strong Tea Party affiliations. They are well funded and are successful with State Legislators where the GOP holds the majority in both the State House and State Senate. Their weakness is their including three amendments in their Article 5 Application, one of which is seen by the Democratic Party as partisan, so all votes to date have been a solid party-line divide. Being there are not 34 states in which the GOP holds the majority in both the state house and state senate, the probability of success for COS alone is not very high. U.S. Term Limits USTL is a lobbying company that has been lobbying for term limits at all levels for the past 30 years. They have a great deal of experience lobbying and a 30-year-developed business and donor base. Their weakness is while they have some great folks, they are known as lobbyists, not activists, by both State Legislators and US Congress, with the typical baggage that accompanies lobbyists. US Congress The strength of members of Congress supporting Term Limits is their visibility and connections. Their weakness is with seniority equaling authority in Congress, they have nearly zero probability of success at this time, although the closer we get to an Article 5 Convention for Term Limits, the higher the probability Congress will pass a Term Limits Amendment to avoid the occurrence of the Convention. Term Limits for US Congress- Political Action Committee Our strength is we are activists, non-partisan and represent the people without being bound by party-affiliations. We focus a great deal of effort on a Term Limits Petition which will be submitted to the State Legislators when asking they pass the application for the Article 5 Convention for Term Limits. Our goal of 5 Million signatures would average 100,000 signatures per state. While petitions do not carry much weight at the national level, when you’re dealing with State Legislators, who win or lose their elections by a few thousand votes, and who typically are closer to their constituents than federal positions, 100,000 signatures from their constituents is very powerful. Our weakness as a volunteer, activist organization is a lack of experience and funding. We are learning and growing, but we to date have been the turtle in the race. Recognizing the need to work together, our Political Action Committee, being non-partisan and a grassroots activist organization with no political affiliations, we have begun setting up an Advisory Board which will include leadership representation from all four players in addition to a few members with skillsets to well-round the experience and knowledge base. Now you know who the players on the national board are. We will work together. And, we will add a Term Limits Amendment to the US Constitution. While Covid restrictions created a hurdle since the original meeting, the engines are revving back up, and the players are hungry for success. Bob Reid Founder/Executive Director Term Limits for US Congress-PAC One of the most common questions is HOW do these corrupt politicians keep getting re-elected?
One of the three paramount concerns for career politicians in Congress is the disconnect from society developed over time.
When talking about using the 2nd Option in Article 5 to add a Term Limits Amendment to the US Constitution, the first question most ask is “How many states have already passed applications for a Term Limits Convention?”
You think it would be a simple answer, but as we all know, when you’re dealing with law or government, nothing is ever simple. There are 17 State Legislatures who have passed applications for an Article 5 Convention for three topics, one of which is Term Limits for US Congress. There are 4 State Legislatures who have passed applications for an Article 5 Convention solely for Term Limits for US Congress. Here’s the tricky part. You CANNOT add the 17 and 4 together. When dealing with law, whether it is contracts or legislation, there are logical terms that determine conditions, inclusions, or exclusions. The 17 States who passed applications for 3 topics did so with inclusive qualifiers. Let me explain. Imagine you have two bowls. In one bowl you have an orange, an apple, and a pear. In the second bowl you have just an apple. You are looking at 20 bowls total. Are all 20 bowls the same? In the Convention of States Projects application they figuratively said, “We want an orange AND an apple AND a pear.” The problem when you’re speaking legalese is when you use ANDs, it binds the parts together and they can’t be divided up, so you have to look at it as if all 3 pieces of fruit are glued together. You can’t take the apples (term limits) out of those 17 bowls and add them to the apples(term limits) from the other three bowls. The problem the Convention of States Project has run into is the Democratic Party sees one of their pieces of fruit, limiting federal government authority, as partisan and has therefore voted against the COS application in every state the application has been voted on. The Convention of States Project began shortly after I started the Term Limits for US Congress movement and I wrote to the head of COS at the time, warning they would come out strong in States where the GOP held both the State House and State Senate, but once they ran out of such States, they would hit a brick wall due to the Democratic Party seeing one of their topics as partisan. Unfortunately, my prediction was true and the potential of their application reaching 34 is very low. Two years ago I called a conference in Harrisonburg, Virginia, and invited members of the other organizations to attend to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each major player, and how the only realistic path to success would be for all of us to work together, to which everyone agreed. In this meeting one issue we discussed was the bowls of fruit and how the ANDs had created a single path for COS and a major roadblock. What I suggested is for the Convention of States Project to reword their application to figuratively something such as, “We want an Orange OR we want an Apple OR we want a Pear OR any combination of the three.” Using ORs creates 7 paths for success for an Article 5 Convention and allows each piece of “fruit” to be used individually while not excluding two or even all three pieces being achieved together. Now some will argue that the applications for an Article 5 Convention don't have to be identical and will think the 20 can all add together. Well, they should consider this. The verbiage in Article 5 doesn't say, so if this were to go to the US Supreme Court, the next thing's they'll look at are "intent" and "precedent." Intent based on documentation at the time is debatable and could go either way, which will leave the court with "precedent." In 1929, Wisconsin approached the US Congress, stating over 34 requests for an Article 5 Convention had been submitted, so they were required to call the Convention. The US Congress ignored them due to the fact there had not been 34 requests for the same topic. In the 90 years that have followed, which would be 45 Congresses, an Article 5 Convention has not been called with a result being 46 Congresses have set a "precedent" that an Article 5 Convention will not be called unless 34 States apply for a Convention for the "same" topic. So, how many applications for an Article 5 Convention have passed that include Term Limits? 21 Can all 21 be counted together towards the 34 needed to call the Convention? No Should you consider this disheartening? Not at all We have issues to resolve and coordination to be done, but we know many states have already proven a willingness to make legislative efforts to call an Article 5 Convention to add Term Limits for US Congress. Covid put a kink in the timeline, slowing progress, but the pace is now picking back up. Bob Reid Founder/Executive Director Term Limits for US Congress- PAC Can you tell me one issue that Congress has caused?
Can you tell me one issue Congress has enflamed? Can you tell me one issue Congress has ignored. Those were the easy questions and likely you had little trouble coming up with answers. Now tell me, can you name one issue Congress has solved? Me neither and that's why I founded Term Limits for US Congress. When those you elect to represent you cause problems, enflame problems, or ignore problems, but NEVER solve problems, it's time to change the rules of the game.. America needs Term Limits to stop the damage Career Politicians are doing to our nation! There is a reason that Term Limits for US Congress hasn't passed even though over 80% of Americans think it should.
Term Limits are in the noise of sensational events. Let me explain. There are always sensational events occurring, whether it be foreign wars, inflation, a virus, gun control, abortion, recession, open borders, or countless others. These sensational events create huge emotional responses in the public and so not surprisingly, the media latch on and provide 24/7 coverage. While the public's attention is forcibly held by the media and politicians on these sensational events, there is little energy left to cover the long-standing problems such as corruption in Congress. The public's thoughts are "We'll get to term limits when we finish with this sensational event that needs to be addressed right now." The problem is there is ALWAYS another sensational event. And, if once doesn't exist or is not sensational enough, the politicians and media will fan the flames, exaggerate the event, or if necessary, lie and create the event, because without a sensational event, they lose the ability to hold and control the public's attention and reaction. The result? No one is looking down in the noise where the core of so many problems lies. We NEED to get rid of the career politicians ruining our nation; being bought by lobbyists; becoming rich while they sell off the average American as a captured market... We must find that the will to make Term Limits for US Congress happen regardless of how many sensational events the politicians and media throw before us. Forty years ago, moderates controlled the nation and the two parties agreed 58% of the time. While Term Limits even then would have flattened the power structure in Congress and avoided just a senior few from deciding how the entire parties would vote, there was still enough overlap to create an environment in which individual politicians could be held accountable for their personal actions.
At that time, should a politician be flagrantly corrupt or disassociated with his/her constituents, a voter in the poll would likely say, “My senator is a scumbag. I would rather vote across party lines since the other party agrees with me the majority of the time, than to re-elected this scumbag.” But, the world has changed greatly from the days when personally accountability still held some sway. Technology has developed into a public need for instant gratification. With a 24/7 news cycle, the media requires constant sensationalism to hold the public’s attention and if no sensational events exist, they will exaggerate or enflame anything to keep us watching. This need for sensationalism has led to the continuous increase in polarizing the two parties so that now what was a 58% overlap in ideologies has decreased literally to 0%. In the eyes of the politicians in Congress, this is great news, because the greater the polarization, the less personal accountability remains. The news outlets pick a side because moderation doesn’t create sensationalism. Once they pick their side, they exaggerate and lambast the other, working the viewers into a froth. Now a voter goes into the poll and says, “My senator is a scumbag, but there’s no way I will ever vote for someone from the evil party.” Where before there were those who might argue that Term Limits for US Congress weren’t necessary, the polarization and sensationalism have left us no choice. America needs Term Limits for US Congress and we can’t wait much longer. We're all so jaded by the scams out there that as soon as someone asks for a donation, we're like "WHY should I donate my hard-earned money to YOU?" So, let me take a second and explain why we need the money and we are NOT a scam. First of all, we are a grassroots movement composed of everyday Americans unlike the other major players in the Term Limits arena who have political backers or have been lobbying for 30 years building a donor base. If you have any doubts, feel free to check with the FEC. We are a registered Political Action Committee. That makes us great in that we aren't on anyone's leash and we have no other priorities other than adding a Term Limits for US Congress Amendment to the Constitution. The bad news? We're as broke as you are and only a few of us have been forking out our own money to keep things going. Some of you may wonder why we need money, so let me give you an example. Let's say we want the Arizona State Legislature to send an application to Congress for an Article 5 Convention solely for Term Limits. And, let's say we've collected 100,000 petition signatures in Arizona. Well, we've got our headquarters in Harrisonburg, Virginia. We have to send three of our people to Arizona and we better plan on them being there for up to a few weeks because this whole thing has to go through a committee before it even goes to the house & senate floors for a vote. So, we're talking travel costs, hotels, food, a rental car (They'll have to share the car.). Once they are there, they've got to deliver the petitions to the 30 State Senators and the 60 State Representatives in the Arizona State Legislature. Needless to say, they couldn't carry all those petitions on the plane, so first they'll have to find a print shop and get them printed out. For each State Legislator, they'll have to have 10,000 sheets of 10 signature petitions printed out. And, they'll have to print those 10,000 sheets 90 TIMES so they can deliver to EACH member of the State Legislature. That's a total of 900,000 printouts. Staples charges $0.13 per sheet. That would be $117,000 just to print out all the petitions for one state. That is just a simple example, but you get the idea. Changing the course of a nation is EXPENSIVE and we don't want to be on any party's strings, which means YOU need to help us cover these costs so we can remain non-partisan and focused SOLELY on adding a Term Limits Amendment to the Constitution. The good news? If EVERYONE who supports term limits pitches in $10 or $20, it will add up quick. This is something we can do, but it won't happen while people sit on the sidelines. EVERYONE has to step forward on something this important. Bob Reid Founder/Executive Director Term Limits for US Congress-PAC The legal definition of a Petition is:
|
AuthorBob Reid Archives
June 2024
Below are quick links to some interesting blog posts.
|
TERM LIMITS FOR US CONGRESS PAC: A GRASSROOTS MOVEMENT
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Term Limits For Us Congress PAC
PO Box 154
Linville, VA 22834
December 15th, 2024
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Term Limits For Us Congress PAC
PO Box 154
Linville, VA 22834
December 15th, 2024